Jump to content

User:Winhunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


Articles I...

[edit]

Created

[edit]

Expanded significantly

[edit]

My other accounts

[edit]

My bookmarks

[edit]
Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 1
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 23
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 56
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 63
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 19
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 5
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 131
Requested RD1 redactions 2
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 15
Open sockpuppet investigations 90
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 1
Copyright violations 1
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 4
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 7
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Possibly contested candidates 4
Other candidates 4
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 35 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 97 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: The GA status of this article about one of the UK's most notable schools has been nullified by persistent additions of unsourced trivia and PoV and general interference over the years by IP editors. School articles attract a lot of nonsense. There is a project to restore this article to GA but it firstneeds first to be long-term protected. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Over the past couple of days, I've edit warred back-and-forth with an IP over the fact that Griffin Peebles participated in the Abu Dhabi round instead of Dan Skocdopole. The IP has continued to revert my edits, even after listing multiple proofs on the article's talk page. I would like to request a temporary semi-protected page status, or a protection for pending changes. For more details and context, please check this discussion at the ANI here. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 23:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:40, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing by IP users. I've tried to get to the bottom of what their issue is on their talk page; rather than answering, they continue the disruptive editing. Swinub 23:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Indiscriminate use of flagicon and unprovoked removal of references by IP users. Pinineeon (talk) 01:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of irrelevant content by IP who has so far refused to engage in discussion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:13, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced additions. (CC) Tbhotch 03:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing a lot of reverting in the last couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IPs persistently adding unsourced content and being disruptive. Two might be the same IP though. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:15, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 13:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Ip address is constantly adding picture in wrong sizes and destroys the composition of the page. In addition, information is given without source Mgfdhsrhe (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Ip vandalism changing boxoffice figure. Multiple reverts happened. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 15:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple disruptive attempts(failed) at redirecting the article. - Ratnahastin (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

User(s) partially blocked: 172.59.154.0/23 (talk · contribs) (from Oklahoma). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. - Ratnahastin (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been the target of a Greek IP-hopper since at least 2 November. Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2a02:587:b00::/41 (talk · contribs). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/AC target since 06:06, 8 February 2025. Alith Anar 17:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:22, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Community sanctions enforcement. Eastern Europe antisemitism ctop RaschenTechner (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – article is under constant attack by biased/right wing editor(s) hiding behind IP, see article history. Denniss (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:188:C580:78D0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page per WP:CT/AP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits here. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 18:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Note: Already pending changes, which seems to be working ok — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs vandalizing this article for quite sometime now, adding texts like "Raza Bukhari has a Crush on Bajwa". -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. EndzoneEnthusiast 20:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Unhelpful removals by a specific IP range since November 2024.[1][2][3][4] The article was protected in November 2024 due to disruptive edits by IPs. Mann Mann (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For a few months, until the Trump matter dies down. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 21:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Annh07 (talk) 21:20, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:25, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism of dynamic ip. Last for few days now. [[5]], [[6]], Theonewithreason (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. BlueboyLINY (talk) 21:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

User who made the report is bold reverting without providing adequate explanations for their reverts, plus they have already been warned by an admin at the past at the article's talk page regarding their edit-warring behaviour. 2A02:85F:F0E5:AB20:3E19:60DB:C4AC:E7A (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:32, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Barack Obama a president has done controversial things including the Affordable Care Act, Allegations of Barack Obama spying on Donald Trump, etc. This may cause controversy and lead to warring or dispute. MersmanD (talk) 22:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Bit of an edit war going on between a multi-IP user and other editors. ZappaMatic 22:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it hasn’t been vandalized recently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.200.39 (talk) 17:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected – The article is not protected due to vandalism, but because of excessive addition of unsourced/inadequately sourced content. Anyhow, the current absence of disruption is likely a consequence of the protection. The history of the article as well as your own recent track record speak against unprotecting the article. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page is a very easy SOCK detection page; specifically WP:LTA/A5. All mass blankings have been reverted within a minute, and protection does help keep the page stable, however, there is a very clear SOCK-behavior going on it since August 2024. Brief protections do not work. I'm honestly requesting unprotection to help catch more of this LTA's accounts. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:51, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

This is just one of many many honeypots for this LTA; I wouldn't have protected it otherwise. Also, you're supposed to ask the protecting admin before making a request here (which is highlighted in bright yellow on this page).-- Ponyobons mots 22:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


I would like to request if my son's page could be restored. I just learned that since his passing in 2018 that the page he created prior to is no longer found. I am his father and would like to update it and protect it for all time. Please let me know if you are able to assist or where I should look for such.

Blessings, Ron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:a901:cb00:c477:fa1:4dc:3634 (talk) 02:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

There's never been any article at that title on the English Wikipedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:36, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
I think this could be read as Jhaysonn Pathak was a contributor here and created a page, title unknown, but there is no user account of that name either. I left a message on the IP talk page. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

5 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Kanye West (request) 2025-02-10 19:50 Fully protected, expires 2025-02-22 at 03:14:07 UTC (log) Modified by Johnuniq on 2025-02-08: "Edit warring / content dispute: protection was indefinite ECP"
File:Flag of the United States.svg (request) 2025-02-12 02:51 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
MediaWiki:Oathauth-ui-general-help (request) 2025-02-12 12:32 MediaWiki page (log)
President of Georgia (request) 2025-02-15 02:04 Fully protected, expires 2025-03-01 at 01:08:07 UTC (log) Protected by Daniel Quinlan on 2025-02-15: "Edit warring / content dispute; requested at WP:RfPP"
MediaWiki:Bad image list (request) 2025-02-15 18:15 MediaWiki page (log) Protected by Redwolf24 on 2005-10-23: "Like all pages in the MediaWiki: space"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
20 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox sports league (request) 2025-01-25 22:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Post-nominals/GBR (request) 2025-01-30 07:35 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ivanvector on 2019-10-25: "Highly visible template: change to TE protection per request and consensus"
Template:Infobox Korean name (request) 2025-02-01 00:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Baseballstats (request) 2025-02-03 07:52 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-02-03 08:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox martial artist (request) 2025-02-05 21:13 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Huggle/warn-unsor-2 (request) 2025-02-06 01:00 Template-protected (log) Protected by Oshwah on 2018-09-09: "High risk template"
Template:Bar box (request) 2025-02-06 08:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Module:Category main article (request) 2025-02-07 09:36 Template-protected (log) From Module:Cat main: Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-08-04: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Designation (request) 2025-02-08 00:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Inflation (request) 2025-02-08 19:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2025-02-12 04:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:Designation/text (request) 2025-02-12 08:18 Template-protected (log) Modified by Samsara on 2017-09-03: "Highly visible template: via RfPP"
Template:College (request) 2025-02-17 23:48 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Db-deleted-multiple (request) 2025-02-18 23:38 Template-protected (log) Protected by MelanieN on 2020-06-19: "Highly visible template"
Module:College color (request) 2025-02-19 01:39 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
Template:Canadian party colour (request) 2025-02-19 06:44 Template-protected (log) Modified by MSGJ on 2018-03-24: "reinstate template protection"
Template:Lang (request) 2025-02-20 08:24 Template-protected (log) Modified by Swarm on 2019-02-24: "Highly visible template"
Module:Gridiron color/data (request) 2025-02-20 14:13 Template-protected (log) Protected by CambridgeBayWeather on 2018-06-22: "Highly visible template"
Template:Starbox begin (request) 2025-02-20 18:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [7]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
That's good to know, because I have the same problem that Vanderwaalforces talks about. I will have to get back to this item. Schwede66 07:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. About to publish many geography stubs (manually written, differing in content, not violating MASSCREATE - see Ledenice and Zapeć for examples). Articles like Cirsium greimleri, First Vrbnik Breviary, Petər Klepəc and Veternica are more representative of my work, though. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

@Jannatulbaqi: Thanks for considering me :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request Autopatrolled permissions. I have experience in creating and editing articles, particularly in Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) and good understand on notability guidelines. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including verifiability, neutrality, and reliable sourcing. I am committed to continuous learning and will ensure that any pages I create meet Wikipedia's standards. I will handle this permission responsibly and always strive to improve my contributions.Thank you for considering my request. Endrabcwizart (talk) 18:47, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


I would like to use AWB for repetitive editing tasks. I do these a lot for the projects I am a part of, and they have become very tedious. Edit: one of the projects I am a part of for a Church, does not have very many active contributors but a very large backlog. The effort to maintain the articles we have would be largely simplified by using AWB.

Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

[edit]

This is a (new) alt account of User:RedactedHumanoid, and has been created with the sole purpose to edit articles that I do not want to edit on my main account (NSFW articles, etc). Most of these articles are semi-protected, so I am requesting confirmed rights so I can edit those pages. RedactedHumanoid66 (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@RedactedHumanoid: Could you please comment here from your main account as well? jlwoodwa (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Sure. I can confirm that this is an alt account of mine, and that it's main purpose is what it stated. I honestly don't really know what else to say given that my alt already said what I think needs to be said. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 02:54, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
 Done stwalkerster (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]

Arcticocean requested that, "If [I] wish to gain [ECR] again, the onus would be on [me] to prove that trust has been regained." To address this challenge, I would like to respond to the two concerns raised:

1. "You have added translated content from other Wikipedias without attribution."
2. "You have artificially split your article contributions into separate edits to more quickly reach a high edit count."


1. Translated content without attribution

In October 2024, I misunderstood the rules regarding proper attribution for translated content. Since January 2025, I believe I have consistently included proper attribution in all my edit summaries, as demonstrated in these examples: here, here or here.


2. Split article contributions

Regarding this concern, I would like to clarify that my first 350 edits, made between 2006 and 2013, occurred before the 500 edits rule was introduced (2016). These edits could not have been intended to meet a requirement that did not exist at the time.
I acknowledge that I intentionally split my contributions to reach the 500 edits threshold, only for the remaining 150 contributions needed to meet this target.
However, since then, I have made over 700 additional contributions (~1200 in total) without splitting them. This can be seen in my average edit size, which is approximately 350 bytes and aligns with averages observed among contributors, including administrators.

I hope this explanation demonstrates my commitment to addressing the concerns raised and regaining trust. Michael Boutboul (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([8][9]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([10]). MusikBot talk 15:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
@ScottishFinnishRadish: would you like to review this first? — xaosflux Talk 13:32, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
At this point I think it would be better assessed by fresh eyes. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
That is to say, eyes other than mine. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Boutboul: ultimately you're well in excess of 500 non-gamed edits, so  Done. But I'd really encourage you to be especially cautious about any edits you make involving the Arab–Israeli conflict; editors who cause problems in that area can be blocked or topic-banned very quickly. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:00, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

I was previously an editor here with an extended confirmed account (User:M3ATH). I am now on this account and would like the extended confirmed right to be transferred. MT(710) 16:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

I can confirm that User:MT-710 is the account I now use. —M3ATH (See · Say) 16:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

[edit]

I will facilitate an editathon on 5 March at this event. saebou (talk) 19:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

 Done, to expire on the 6th stwalkerster (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights

I have authored a few articles, improved the quality of many articles including adding high quality references and improving encyclopedic quality. I have also limited experiences in deletion. I also have just been granted AFC reviewer options and starting to increase my participation in that. Welcome feedback if I can qualify. Thanks for the consideration Trex32 (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Trex32, Can you please explain how you came to possess the rights to File:Anand Reddi 2024.jpg? signed, Rosguill talk 00:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
HI Rosquill, In 2015, I took a picture of the subject among other panelists as a journalist blogger at conference in Brazil in 2015 on maternal and child health. I edited the photo and had permission from the subject and the other conference panelists and the conference organizers. Please forgive me if I uploaded the photo incorrectly with the incorrect attributions. I thought i did it correctly. I see I incorrectly labeled the photo as 2015 and not 2024. I will correct it. Thank you for the consideration. Grateful for the consideration. Trex32 (talk) 02:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Though I predominantly work with redirects, at least recently, I also engage with new pages and would like to help further in the new pages patrol in reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. I have made almost 46,000 edits and believe that I can help. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in this permission. Unfortunately, your AfD history has a rather low match-rate, and includes several examples where other participants criticized your WP:BEFORE.  Not done signed, Rosguill talk 00:14, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
How can I check on my own AfD history? I know how to check my own edit history, but I do not know how to distinguish just the AfD history easily and clearly. Iljhgtn (talk) 23:09, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to review those examples that you are referring to as well please. Iljhgtn (talk) 23:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Iljhgtn, that would be the AfD stats report. signed, Rosguill talk 23:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
According to that, 63.2% were "matches". What is considered a "good" "match-rate"? Iljhgtn (talk) 23:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Because I reviewed WP:NPRCRITERIA and did not see any mention of this aspect there as part of the guideline for granting this permission. Iljhgtn (talk) 23:26, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
I don’t think I’ve conferred permissions for anyone with match rates below 70%, and I’d say most candidates are low-80s to 90s. The quality of the participation also matters beyond the pure numbers—I’d rather see a lower match rate paired with thoughtful participation than a 99% match rate where it’s pure pile-on votes signed, Rosguill talk 23:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
That makes sense, but I know my votes are of the former type rather than "pile-on votes". Iljhgtn (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Correction, !votes. Iljhgtn (talk) 23:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Would it be acceptable then to do a trial? Iljhgtn (talk) 23:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
no, if I thought you were ready for a trial I would have conferred it already. signed, Rosguill talk 23:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
yeah, but you also aren't reliably doing due diligence in searching for sources, as evinced by the discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manufacturing Consent (Burawoy book), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perilous Passage, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lost Bible, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York City Administrative Code. I think this addresses your question below as well. signed, Rosguill talk 23:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Which examples involved criticism of my WP:BEFORE? I am familiar with the policy and do take precautions and engage in the proper "before" research and background prior to any nomination for deletion etc. Iljhgtn (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Iljhgtn, I just wanted to mention that if you look at your name at the top of this request, you'll see links to all sorts of data like a CSD log if you have one and your AFD stats. It might be worth reviewing what's available. And with Twinkle, you can maintain logs of all of your deletion taggings. Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply @Liz. It would appear as if you were the closer on several of the AfDs that I was involved in. I think for those mentioned above at least @Rosguill, you will find that the involved editors were often only 2-3, and in several of those instances there was one comment, then the other 1-2 could be characterized as "pile-on" edits as you described them (which I take to mean that they added no further context and just agreed with a prior comment). Iljhgtn (talk) 02:28, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Looking at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manufacturing Consent (Burawoy book) there were two "Keep" !votes and no further discussion, with the second of the two beyond a simple agreement with the first one.
Also, the examples you provided were discovered by me as some examples with no sources when I found them, in some cases after over a decade or more. I would perform more than a WP:BEFORE, and would often improve the article (such as adding a book cover in many cases, included Manufacturing Consent (Burawoy book) which previously was a mostly barren stub. I may have a "low match rate" percentage then as a result of coming into contact with numerous articles which had zero prior sources, though it is ironic perhaps that it is a result of the act of my nomination that suddenly galvanizes new interest and therefore brings into the fold other editors that performed an even deeper dive and then !voted on the respective stubs to be kept. I do not think that should reflect poorly though, or at least not disproportionally negatively on my candidacy as a new page reviewer.
At the end of the day, it is up to an admin to grant the permission of course, and if none see fit to do so then I will simply get on with other things. Iljhgtn (talk) 02:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

I would like to be a new page reviewer, I continuously contribute to New Pages and having failed the previous request to be one, i would like to try once again having positively learned more and contributed to much more new pages. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 07:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([11]). MusikBot talk 08:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) You made you first edit to Wikipedia just over a month ago and have made only 389 edits to mainspace. This still falls short of the the minimum criteria linked to above for this user right, and admins may call for additional experience.Tagging of pages for deletion is best left to qualified New Page Reviewers. We do need more reviewers so I would suggest you thoroughly read and understand the tutorial at WP:NPP, and then reapply in a couple of months when you have a measurable track record. You may also wish to enroll at the NPP School. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

I have authored a few articles, commonly support and help new editors, and enjoy helping the community by encouraging proper creation of articles and assisting with maintenance. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 216 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 21:50, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

I mostly engage with improving new pages like adding cats, short desc., etc. and also quite active in AFD, would like to help further in the new pages patrol in reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. AgerJoy talk 17:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 373 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 17:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello again, I was granted NPR for the January backlog drive, and reviewed 48.4 in total. I was planning to do a lot more, but I quickly learnt it's best to stick with subjects I'm familiar with, mainly English football, so didn't end up doing much beyond that. Anyway, I'd like to continue reviewing. I doubt I'll be a prolific reviewer, but otherwise happy to handle what I come across, and participate in future backlog drives as required. I only had a couple of re-reviews, so I welcome any admin to check over other reviews I've made. Thanks. CNC (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 27 February 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 18:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

Page mover

[edit]
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ahecht just curious, would you object to a grant here? If so this should be declined for now. Otherwise I'd consider granting since PCR is a pretty newbie-friendly permission. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
@Elli I haven't re-reviewed their history, but if there have been no significant red flags since mid-January I'd be fine with granting. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
17:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia and focused on editing articles, reviewing new pages & combating vandalism. I am requesting for PCR right to speeding up the review process for pending changes. I am familiar with key Wikipedia content policies, including vandalism, biographies of living persons (BLP), neutral point of view (NPOV), verifiability, and copyright compliance. I've also been involved in patrolling recent changes, where I use Twinkle tool to revert vandalism. With my experience and understanding of these policies, I believe that I can effectively contribute to reviewing pending changes. 𝐌P𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 20:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([12]). MusikBot talk 18:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

I patrol recent changes, mainly for vandalism, but I also get in contact with a lot of pending changes and like to help. I am familiar with the related policies. Squawk7700 (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 17:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

I am requesting reviewer rights to help improve the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia articles, particularly in areas related to Pakistan and some notable international articles like television shows and international cricket. I also created a page Kana Yaari directly, which is a result of my performances on Wikipedia. I have gained experience through consistent and constructive editing, and I am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies, including neutral point of view, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. I aim to assist in maintaining the integrity of semi-protected pages and contribute to the efficient review of pending changes. Currently I'm a auto confirmed user rights. Sackiii (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 3 days. MusikBot talk 20:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I routinely edit (especially recently) and have a reasonable editing history for which a track record can be established. I have read WP:VD, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:V, WP:!, WP:C and the guideline on the reviewing process for RPC. HKLionel (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

@QalasQalas: what would you use rollback for? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
AntiVandalism as you see this Edit and Edit2 new users vandlized account which why i need roll thanks. QalasQalas (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. I've recently come across several instances where rollbacking would be faster than manually reverting nonconstructive consecutive edits. I don't patrol Recent Changes, but I am quite active and have more than 3,100 pages on my Watchlist. Thanks for your consideration. PRRfan (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 17:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]
    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 27
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 1
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
    Candidates for speedy deletion 18
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 5

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 582
    Templates for deletion 125
    Categories for deletion 335
    Wikipedia files for discussion 28
    All redirects for discussion 337
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 55
    Possible copyright violations 23
    All articles proposed for deletion 233
    All files proposed for deletion 25
    Unsorted AfD debates 5
    All files with the same name on Commons 35
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 461
    Unknown copyright status 45
    Unknown source 37
    No non-free use rationale 1
    Replaceable non-free use images 14
    Disputed non-free use images 25

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,279
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 449
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,435
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,299 0.49
    All articles needing rewrite 6,173 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,340 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 40,566 0.58

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,352 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 540,531 7.77
    All articles lacking sources 68,161 0.98
    All unreferenced BLPs 16 0
    All articles needing additional references 479,352 6.89
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,666 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,872 1.52
    All articles with dead external links 282,058 4.05

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 137 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 19 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,191 0.02
    All articles to be split 841 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 2 -
    Stub categories 19,352 -
    All uncategorized pages 605 0.01
    All orphaned articles 54,491 0.78
    All articles needing copy edit 2,390 0.03
    All articles with style issues 19,312 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,769 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,580 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 614
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 6,285
    All accuracy disputes 15,766
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 1
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 4
    All articles to be expanded 65,857

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    [edit]

    Hong Kong

    [edit]
    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    [edit]
    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.